Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 28
Filtrar
1.
Euro Surveill ; 28(47)2023 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37997666

RESUMO

IntroductionTwo large multicentre European hospital networks have estimated vaccine effectiveness (VE) against COVID-19 since 2021.AimWe aimed to measure VE against PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 in hospitalised severe acute respiratory illness (SARI) patients ≥ 20 years, combining data from these networks during Alpha (March-June)- and Delta (June-December)-dominant periods, 2021.MethodsForty-six participating hospitals across 14 countries follow a similar generic protocol using the test-negative case-control design. We defined complete primary series vaccination (PSV) as two doses of a two-dose or one of a single-dose vaccine ≥ 14 days before onset.ResultsWe included 1,087 cases (538 controls) and 1,669 cases (1,442 controls) in the Alpha- and Delta-dominant periods, respectively. During the Alpha period, VE against hospitalisation with SARS-CoV2 for complete Comirnaty PSV was 85% (95% CI: 69-92) overall and 75% (95% CI: 42-90) in those aged ≥ 80 years. During the Delta period, among SARI patients ≥ 20 years with symptom onset ≥ 150 days from last PSV dose, VE for complete Comirnaty PSV was 54% (95% CI: 18-74). Among those receiving Comirnaty PSV and mRNA booster (any product) ≥ 150 days after last PSV dose, VE was 91% (95% CI: 57-98). In time-since-vaccination analysis, complete all-product PSV VE was > 90% in those with their last dose < 90 days before onset; ≥ 70% in those 90-179 days before onset.ConclusionsOur results from this EU multi-country hospital setting showed that VE for complete PSV alone was higher in the Alpha- than the Delta-dominant period, and addition of a first booster dose during the latter period increased VE to over 90%.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Humanos , Adulto , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacina BNT162 , RNA Viral , SARS-CoV-2 , Eficácia de Vacinas , Hospitalização , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia
2.
Euro Surveill ; 28(47)2023 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37997665

RESUMO

IntroductionThe I-MOVE-COVID-19 and VEBIS hospital networks have been measuring COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness (VE) in participating European countries since early 2021.AimWe aimed to measure VE against PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 in patients ≥ 20 years hospitalised with severe acute respiratory infection (SARI) from December 2021 to July 2022 (Omicron-dominant period).MethodsIn both networks, 46 hospitals (13 countries) follow a similar test-negative case-control protocol. We defined complete primary series vaccination (PSV) and first booster dose vaccination as last dose of either vaccine received ≥ 14 days before symptom onset (stratifying first booster into received < 150 and ≥ 150 days after last PSV dose). We measured VE overall, by vaccine category/product, age group and time since first mRNA booster dose, adjusting by site as a fixed effect, and by swab date, age, sex, and presence/absence of at least one commonly collected chronic condition.ResultsWe included 2,779 cases and 2,362 controls. The VE of all vaccine products combined against hospitalisation for laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 was 43% (95% CI: 29-54) for complete PSV (with last dose received ≥ 150 days before onset), while it was 59% (95% CI: 51-66) after addition of one booster dose. The VE was 85% (95% CI: 78-89), 70% (95% CI: 61-77) and 36% (95% CI: 17-51) for those with onset 14-59 days, 60-119 days and 120-179 days after booster vaccination, respectively.ConclusionsOur results suggest that, during the Omicron period, observed VE against SARI hospitalisation improved with first mRNA booster dose, particularly for those having symptom onset < 120 days after first booster dose.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Pneumonia , Humanos , Adulto , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Eficácia de Vacinas , SARS-CoV-2 , Hospitalização , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , RNA Mensageiro
3.
JMIR Res Protoc ; 12: e52114, 2023 Nov 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37995118

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Globally, COVID-19 is in transition from the acute pandemic phase into a postacute phase, and special attention should be paid at this time to COVID-19 control strategies. Understanding public knowledge and attitudes plays a pivotal role in controlling COVID-19's spread and provides information about the public's adherence to preventive and control measures. OBJECTIVE: This study protocol describes the planning and management of a survey to investigate the persistent or changing trends in knowledge and attitudes regarding COVID-19, vaccination, and nonpharmaceutical preventive measures among COVID-19 cases' household contacts aged 18 years and older, after the acute phase of the pandemic in Catalonia and Navarre in Spain. The secondary objectives include investigating the rate of secondary transmission in households, taking into account the demographic characteristics, clinical manifestations, and preventive measures toward COVID-19. METHODS: A telephone questionnaire was designed to assess the changing trends in knowledge, preventive measures, and attitudes toward COVID-19 in 3 rounds (after identification as a household contact, 3 months later, and 6 months later). The questionnaire was developed following an extensive literature review and through discussions with a panel of experts who designed and assessed the validity of the questionnaire in terms of relevance, consistency, completeness, and clarity. The questionnaire consists of the following 7 sections: social and demographic characteristics (ie, gender, age, educational level, and workplace), comorbidities and risk factors (according to the recommendations from the COVID-19 vaccination strategy), epidemiological data (ie, exposure time, relationship with index cases, and frequency of use of nonpharmaceutical preventive measures), COVID-19 vaccination status (ie, the number and date of doses received), knowledge and attitudes toward COVID-19 (assessed using a 5-point Likert scale-totally agree, agree, neither agree nor disagree, disagree, and totally disagree), and sources of information (including traditional mass media, social media, and official sources). RESULTS: A pilot study was performed in May 2022 to evaluate the questionnaire with 22 household contacts. Preliminary findings indicated that the questionnaire was feasible and acceptable in the general population. The average response time was 15 minutes, with greater variations in responses by older participants. After the pilot study, recruitment of participants began and is expected to be completed at the end of the year 2023, after which the final results will be available in 2024. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the low transmission levels of SARS-CoV-2 and the relaxation of containment measures, the implementation of the survey during the postacute phase will provide valuable insight to assist public health decision-making and control the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and other respiratory viruses, thereby attenuating the negative effects of COVID-19 at individual and population level. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/52114.

4.
An Sist Sanit Navar ; 46(2)2023 Aug 16.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37594061

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Between February 2020 and September 2022, SARS-CoV-2 has circulated uninterruptedly throughout Spain. This study analyses COVID-19 infections, hospitalizations, and deaths in Navarre. METHODS: Enhanced epidemiological surveillance and results of seroepidemiological surveys were used to analyze COVID-19 infections, hospitalizations, and deaths, based on the vaccination coverage and other preventive measures applied from February 2020 to September 2022. RESULTS: A total of 295,424 COVID-19 cases were confirmed (45% of the population in Navarre); 8,594 required hospital admission (1.3%), 832 were admitted to intensive care units (1.3‰) and 1,725 died (2.6‰). Over the first wave of the pandemic, there were 1,934 hospitalizations and 529 deaths from confirmed COVID-19 cases over a few weeks; these figures dropped rapidly following lockdown. Until October 2021, SARS-CoV-2 circulation was modulated by non-pharmacological preventive measures. The subsequent relaxation of these measures led to a wide circulation of the omicron variant, increasing the number of cases by three-fold. The high vaccination coverage against COVID-19 introduced decisive changes in the epidemiology of the disease, reducing to less than 2%, 0.1%, and 0.5% the cases requiring hospitalization, intensive care unit admission, or that died, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Initial lockdown and non-pharmacological preventive measures helped control SARS-CoV-2 transmission until vaccination was extended. Vaccination achieved a decisive reduction of the COVID-19 severity and lethality.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , SARS-CoV-2 , Espanha/epidemiologia , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis , Hospitalização
5.
An. sist. sanit. Navar ; 46(2): [e1044], May-Agos. 2023. tab, graf
Artigo em Espanhol | IBECS | ID: ibc-224230

RESUMO

Fundamento: El SARS-CoV-2 circuló ininterrumpidamente enEspaña durante el período comprendido entre febrero de 2020y septiembre de 2022. Este estudio analiza su repercusión en lasinfecciones, hospitalizaciones y defunciones en Navarra. Métodos: A partir de la vigilancia epidemiológica reforzada yde los resultados de encuestas sero-epidemiológicas, se hananalizado las infecciones, hospitalizaciones y defunciones porCOVID-19 en función de la cobertura vacunal y otras medidaspreventivas aplicadas durante el período del estudio.Resultados: Se confirmaron 295.424 personas con COVID-19(45% de la población navarra), 8.594 requirieron ingreso hospitalario (1,3%), 832 ingresaron en unidades de cuidados intensi-vos (1,3‰) y 1.725 fallecieron (2,6‰). Durante la primera ondapandémica, en pocas semanas se registraron 1.934 hospitalizaciones y 529 defunciones por COVID-19 confirmado; dicha cifrase redujo significativamente tras el confinamiento domiciliario. Hasta octubre de 2021, la circulación del SARS-CoV-2 estuvomodulada por las medidas preventivas no farmacológicas. Laposterior relajación de las mismas dio paso a una amplia circulación de la variante ómicron, triplicando el número de casosregistrados hasta entonces. La alta cobertura vacunal frente ala COVID-19 introdujo cambios decisivos en su epidemiología,reduciendo la proporción de casos que requirieron hospitalización, ingreso en unidades de cuidados intensivos y fallecimientos a menos del 2%, 0,1% y 0,5%, respectivamente. Conclusiones: El confinamiento domiciliario inicial y las medidas preventivas no farmacológicas contuvieron la circulación delSARS-CoV-2 hasta extenderse la vacunación, con la cual se logróuna reducción decisiva en la gravedad y letalidad de la COVID-19.(AU)


Background: Between February 2020 and September 2022,SARS-CoV-2 has circulated uninterruptedly throughout Spain.This study analyses COVID-19 infections, hospitalizations, anddeaths in Navarre. Methods: Enhanced epidemiological surveillance and results ofseroepidemiological surveys were used to analyze COVID-19 infections, hospitalizations, and deaths, based on the vaccinationcoverage and other preventive measures applied from February2020 to September 2022. Results: A total of 295,424 COVID-19 cases were confirmed (45%of the population in Navarre); 8,594 required hospital admission (1.3%), 832 were admitted to intensive care units (1.3‰)and 1,725 died (2.6‰). Over the first wave of the pandemic,there were 1,934 hospitalizations and 529 deaths from confirmed COVID-19 cases over a few weeks; these figures droppedrapidly following lockdown. Until October 2021, SARS-CoV-2circulation was modulated by non-pharmacological preventivemeasures. The subsequent relaxation of these measures led to awide circulation of the omicron variant, increasing the numberof cases by three-fold. The high vaccination coverage againstCOVID-19 introduced decisive changes in the epidemiology ofthe disease, reducing to less than 2%, 0.1%, and 0.5% the casesrequiring hospitalization, intensive care unit admission, or thatdied, respectively. Conclusions: Initial lockdown and non-pharmacological preventive measures helped control SARS-CoV-2 transmission untilvaccination was extended. Vaccination achieved a decisive reduction of the COVID-19 severity and lethality.(AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Pandemias , Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Infecções por Coronavirus/mortalidade , Infecções por Coronavirus/transmissão , Hospitalização , Coronavírus Relacionado à Síndrome Respiratória Aguda Grave , Espanha/epidemiologia , Saúde Pública , Serviços de Vigilância Epidemiológica , Vacinas , Vacinação , Inquéritos e Questionários
6.
An. sist. sanit. Navar ; (Monografía n 8): 667-681, Jun 23, 2023. tab, graf, ilus
Artigo em Espanhol | IBECS | ID: ibc-222499

RESUMO

Fundamento. El SARS-CoV-2 ha circulado ininterrumpidamente en España desde febrero de 2020 hasta septiembre de 2022. El presente estudio estima y describe su repercusión en infecciones, hospitalizaciones y defunciones. Métodos. A partir de la vigilancia epidemiológica reforzada, los resultados de encuestas seroepidemiológicas y los datos de mortalidad diaria, se han analizado las infecciones, hospitalizaciones y defunciones por COVID-19 entre febrero de 2020 y septiembre de 2022 en Navarra. Resultados. Se confirmaron 295.424 personas con COVID-19 (45% de la población), 8594 requirieron ingreso hospitalario (1,3% habitantes), 832 ingresaron en unidades de cuidados intensivos (UCI) (1,3 por 1000) y 1725 fallecieron (2,6 por 1000). La primera onda pandémica produjo 1934 hospitalizaciones y 529 defunciones por COVID-19 confirmado en pocas semanas, y su número descendió rápidamente tras el confinamiento domiciliario. Hasta octubre de 2021 la circulación del SARS-CoV-2 estuvo modulada por las medidas preventivas no farmacológicas. La extensión de la vacunación frente a la COVID-19 introdujo cambios decisivos en la epidemiología de la enfermedad, reduciendo a menos del 2% los casos que requerían hospitalización, del 0,1% los que ingresaban en UCI y del 0,5% la letalidad. Conclusiones. Coincidiendo con la generalización de la vacunación se produjo una reducción importante de la gravedad y letalidad de la COVID-19, que pasó de comportarse inicialmente como una pandemia, a acabar asemejándose a otras infecciones endémicas por virus respiratorios. El confinamiento domiciliario inicial, las medidas preventivas no farmacológicas y la vacunación de la COVID-19 han sido intervenciones eficaces y oportunas para reconducir el curso de la pandemia en diferentes momentos.(AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Pandemias , Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Infecções por Coronavirus/imunologia , Infecções por Coronavirus/mortalidade , Hospitalização , Coronavírus Relacionado à Síndrome Respiratória Aguda Grave , Infecções , Espanha , Monitoramento Epidemiológico , Inquéritos e Questionários , Vacinação , Prevenção de Doenças
7.
Euro Surveill ; 28(5)2023 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36729113

RESUMO

BackgroundAs COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 infection was lower for cases of the Omicron vs the Delta variant, understanding the effect of vaccination in reducing risk of hospitalisation and severe disease among COVID-19 cases is crucial.AimTo evaluate risk reduction of hospitalisation and severe disease in vaccinated COVID-19 cases during the Omicron BA.1-predominant period in Navarre, Spain.MethodsA case-to-case comparison included COVID-19 epidemiological surveillance data in adults ≥ 18 years from 3 January-20 March 2022. COVID-19 vaccination status was compared between hospitalised and non-hospitalised cases, and between severe (intensive care unit admission or death) and non-severe cases using logistic regression models.ResultsAmong 58,952 COVID-19 cases, 565 (1.0%) were hospitalised and 156 (0.3%) were severe. The risk of hospitalisation was reduced within the first 6 months after full COVID-19 vaccination (complete primary series) (adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 0.06; 95% CI: 0.04-0.09) and after 6 months (aOR: 0.16; 95% CI: 0.12-0.21; pcomparison < 0.001), as well as after a booster dose (aOR: 0.06: 95% CI: 0.04-0.07). Similarly, the risk of severe disease was reduced (aOR: 0.13, 0.18, and 0.06, respectively). Compared with cases fully vaccinated 6 months or more before a positive test, those who had received a booster dose had lower risk of hospitalisation (aOR: 0.38; 95% CI: 0.28-0.52) and severe disease (aOR: 0.38; 95% CI: 0.21-0.68).ConclusionsFull COVID-19 vaccination greatly reduced the risk of hospitalisation and severe outcomes in COVID-19 cases with the Omicron variant, and a booster dose improved this effect in people aged over 65 years.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Adulto , Humanos , Idoso , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Espanha/epidemiologia , Comportamento de Redução do Risco , Hospitalização
8.
J Infect Public Health ; 16(3): 410-417, 2023 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36724697

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 vaccination was expected to reduce SARS-CoV-2 transmission, but the relevance of this effect remains unclear. We aimed to estimate the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination of the index cases and their close contacts in reducing the probability of SARS-CoV-2 transmission. METHODS: Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 infection was evaluated in two cohorts of adult close contacts of COVID-19 confirmed cases (social and household settings) by COVID-19 vaccination status of the index case and the close contact, from April to November 2021 in Navarre, Spain. The effects of vaccination of the index case and the close contact were estimated as (1-adjusted relative risk) × 100%. RESULTS: Among 19,631 social contacts, 3257 (17%) were confirmed with SARS-CoV-2. COVID-19 vaccination of the index case reduced infectiousness by 44% (95% CI, 27-57%), vaccination of the close contact reduced susceptibility by 69% (95% CI, 65-73%), and vaccination of both reduced transmissibility by 74% (95% CI, 70-78%) in social settings, suggesting some synergy of effects. Among 20,708 household contacts, 6269 (30%) were infected, and vaccine effectiveness estimates were 13% (95% CI, -5% to 28%), 61% (95% CI, 58-64%), and 52% (95% CI, 47-56%), respectively. These estimates were lower in older people and had not relevant differences between the Alpha (April-June) and Delta (July-November) variant periods. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 vaccination reduces infectiousness and susceptibility; however, these effects are insufficient for complete control of SARS-CoV-2 transmission, especially in older people and household setting. Relaxation of preventive behaviors after vaccination may counteract part of the vaccine effect on transmission.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Adulto , Humanos , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Vacinação
9.
AIDS Care ; 35(6): 892-898, 2023 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35102807

RESUMO

Understanding patient satisfaction with healthcare services can help identify patients' unmet needs and increase treatment adherence. This study aimed to evaluate the satisfaction of people living with HIV with overall HIV care service in Navarra, Spain, using a cross-sectional survey. The survey included a patient-reported experience measure (PREMs) consisting of five statements, and participants were also asked to rate the overall care they receive from the HIV service. Chi-square tests were used to detect differences between groups for statements and Kruskal-Wallis rank test was used to detect differences in ranking of the HIV service. The 395 participants gave the HIV service a mean score of 9.3 points out of 10 (standard deviation 1.1). Only 15 (4%) gave a score of under 8 out of 10, and adherence to antiretroviral therapy was associated with higher ranking of the service. Agreement for all five statements ranged from 80% to 96%. Those without stable housing, with mental health problems, and unemployed felt less supported to manage their HIV. These results highlight the need to regularly assess patient satisfaction with the HIV care and that care should account for social and economic factors that could influence health.


Assuntos
Infecções por HIV , Satisfação do Paciente , Humanos , Infecções por HIV/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por HIV/diagnóstico , Estudos Transversais , Espanha/epidemiologia , Serviços de Saúde
10.
Postgrad Med ; 135(4): 352-360, 2023 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36305320

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Second-generation direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) have shown high efficacy in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections in clinical trials. This study aimed to estimate the effectiveness in real-life conditions and their capacity to eliminate HCV infection in the general population. METHODS: In this observational cohort study, patients with active HCV infection who commenced DAA treatment between 2015 and 2020 in Navarre, Spain, were studied. Sustained virological response (SVR), defined as an undetectable viral load 12 weeks after the end of treatment, was evaluated until the end of 2021. RESULTS: Of a total 1366 HCV-infected patients that commenced treatment, 19.3% (n = 263) were HIV-coinfected. After the first DAA treatment, SVR was achieved in 96.6% (n = 1320/1366) of patients and in 97.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 96.6%-98.3%) of those who completed treatment (per-protocol analysis; n = 1320/1351). SVR was achieved in 97.9% (n = 1066/1089) and 96.9% (n = 254/262) of mono-infected and HIV-coinfected patients, respectively. Thirty-one patients had virological failure due to non-response (n = 19), poor compliance (n = 9), and with adverse events (n = 3). Of 27 patients that received a second treatment, 24 attained SVR (one after a third treatment), two died, and one that did not achieve SVR declined a third treatment. Three patients were re-infected, re-treated, and achieved SVR. At the end of the study, 1344 patients (98.4%, 95% CI 97.6%-98.9%) had achieved SVR, and only 1.8% needed more than one course of treatment. All patients who completed the treatment and were followed-up achieved SVR. CONCLUSION: With DAAs, SVR was achieved in all patients with active HCV infection who completed follow-up, and a second course of treatment was only necessary in a small proportion of patients. Adherence to treatment is essential for HCV infection elimination.


Assuntos
Infecções por HIV , Hepatite C Crônica , Hepatite C , Humanos , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Hepatite C Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos de Viabilidade , Objetivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Hepatite C/tratamento farmacológico , Hepatite C/induzido quimicamente , Hepacivirus , Resposta Viral Sustentada , Infecções por HIV/tratamento farmacológico
11.
J Infect Dis ; 227(3): 332-338, 2023 02 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36179126

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: We compare the risk of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outcomes among co-circulating severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants between January 2021 and May 2022 in Navarra, Spain. METHODS: We compared the frequency of hospitalization and severe disease (intensive care unit admission or death) due to COVID-19 among the co-circulating variants. Variants analyzed were nonvariants of concern (non-VOCs), Alpha, Delta, Omicron BA.1, and Omicron BA.2. Logistic regression models were used to estimate adjusted odds ratio (aOR). RESULTS: The Alpha variant had a higher risk of hospitalization (aOR, 1.86 [95 confidence interval {CI}, 1.282.71]) and severe disease (aOR, 2.40 [95 CI, 1.314.40]) than non-VOCs. The Delta variant did not show a significantly different risk of hospitalization (aOR, 0.73 [95 CI, .401.30]) and severe disease (aOR, 3.04 [95 CI, .5716.22]) compared to the Alpha variant. The Omicron BA.1 significantly reduced both risks relative to the Delta variant (aORs, 0.28 [95 CI, .16.47] and 0.23 [95 CI, .12.46], respectively). The Omicron BA.2 reduced the risk of hospitalization compared to BA.1 (aOR, 0.52 [95 CI, .29.95]). CONCLUSIONS: The Alpha and Delta variants showed an increased risk of hospitalization and severe disease, which decreased considerably with the Omicron BA.1 and BA.2. Surveillance of variants can lead to important differences in severity.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2/genética , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Hospitalização , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva
12.
Euro Surveill ; 27(33)2022 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35983774

RESUMO

In Navarre, Spain, in May 2022, the seroprevalence of anti-nucleocapsid (N) and anti-spike (S) antibodies of SARS-CoV-2 was 58.9% and 92.7%, respectively. The incidence of confirmed COVID-19 thereafter through July was lower in people with anti-N antibodies (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 0.08; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.05-0.13) but not with anti-S antibodies (aOR = 1.06; 95% CI: 0.47-2.38). Hybrid immunity, including anti-N antibodies induced by natural exposure to SARS-CoV-2, seems essential in preventing Omicron COVID-19 cases.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Antivirais , COVID-19 , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/imunologia , Humanos , Proteínas do Nucleocapsídeo , SARS-CoV-2 , Estudos Soroepidemiológicos , Espanha/epidemiologia , Glicoproteína da Espícula de Coronavírus
13.
Euro Surveill ; 27(26)2022 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35775428

RESUMO

Compared with individuals unvaccinated in the current and three previous influenza seasons, in 2021/22, influenza vaccine effectiveness at primary care level was 37% (95% CI: 16 to 52) for current season vaccination, regardless of previous doses, and 35% (95% CI: -3 to 45) for only previous seasons vaccination. Against influenza A(H3N2), estimates were 39% (95% CI: 16 to 55) and 24% (95% CI: -8 to 47) suggesting moderate effectiveness of current season vaccination and possible remaining effect of prior vaccinations.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra Influenza , Influenza Humana , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Humanos , Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H3N2 , Influenza Humana/epidemiologia , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Estações do Ano , Espanha/epidemiologia , Vacinação
14.
Microbiol Spectr ; 10(2): e0000822, 2022 04 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35412379

RESUMO

The present study aimed to compare the susceptibility and infectivity between the Alpha and Delta variants of SARS-CoV-2 and to investigate characteristics of the index case and the contact that may affect transmission. The risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection was compared between close contacts of COVID-19 cases with Alpha and Delta variants during June 2021 to August 2021. In index cases, Spike gene target failure (TaqPath) was used as a proxy of Alpha variant and the L452R mutation (TaqMan) for Delta variant. Cox regression models were used to estimate adjusted relative risks (RR). We compared close contacts of index cases with Alpha (n = 2139) and Delta variants (n = 5439). Delta variant was more transmissible overall (relative risk [RR] 1.32, 95% CI = 1.13 to 1.53), and in non-household contacts (RR 1.71, 95% CI = 1.35 to 2.16), but not in household contacts (RR 1.10, 95% CI = 0.91 to 1.34; Pinteraction < 0.001). Delta variant excess transmission was observed when the index cases were 12 to 39 years old (RR 1.51, 95% CI = 1.27 to 1.79) and the close contacts were 18 to 39 years old (RR 1.62, 95% CI = 1.29 to 2.03), but not among those younger or older than such ages. Differences in transmissibility between variants disappeared with vaccination of the index case (RR 0.68, 95% CI = 0.46 to 1.02), but not with vaccination of the close contact. This report shows that the Delta variant is more transmissible than Alpha variant mainly among young adults. Vaccination of the index cases reduced the excess transmission, which reinforces the recommendation of vaccination to reduce transmission of the Delta variant. IMPORTANCE The higher transmissibility of the Delta variant of SARS-CoV-2 in comparison with the Alpha variant has been reported. We compared the transmission of the Alpha and Delta variants by characteristics and COVID-19 vaccination status of index cases and their close contacts. Interestingly, the Delta variant showed increased transmissibility when the index case was an adolescent or young adult and when the close contact was a young adult; however, in index cases and close contacts of other age groups, transmission did not differ between variants. This may explain the increased proportion of young people who have been infected in the surges due to the Delta variant. The Delta variant was more transmissible than the Alpha variant when the index cases were unvaccinated against COVID-19, and their vaccination equaled the transmissibility of both variants, which suggests a higher impact of vaccination in controlling transmission of the Delta variant.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Adolescente , Adulto , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Criança , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2/genética , Vacinação , Adulto Jovem
15.
Postgrad Med ; 134(2): 230-238, 2022 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35102793

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Many factors might affect SARS-CoV-2 transmission, but their relevance is not well established. The objectives were to assess the secondary attack rate (SAR) and the risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 transmission from confirmed index cases to their close contacts in household and non-household settings. METHODS: This cohort study included the close contacts of SARS-CoV-2 infected cases confirmed between May and December 2020 in Navarre, Spain. Epidemiological and clinical variables of the index case and close contacts were collected. The SAR was calculated, and the independent effect of each variable on the transmission risk was evaluated by logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 59,900 close contacts of 20,048 index cases were studied, and 53.6% were household contacts. SAR was 34.9% overall, 46.8% in household contacts and 21.1% in non-household contacts. The risk of transmission was higher in household setting (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 2.96, 95% CI 2.84-3.07), from symptomatic index cases (aOR 1.50, 95% CI 1.43-1.58), immigrants (aOR 1.44, 95% CI 1.36-1.52), and increased with age. A higher susceptibility of close contacts was associated with 5-14 years of age, immigrants (aOR 1.54), very low or low-income level (aOR 1.27, and aOR, 1.17, respectively), healthcare work (aOR 1.21), and diagnosis of diabetes (aOR 1.14, 95%CI 1.03-1.25), chronic kidney disease (aOR 1.18, 95%CI 1.04-1.35), hypertension (aOR 1.11, 95% CI 1.03-1.19), and severe obesity (aOR 1.18, 95% CI 1.00-1.38). Transmission increased progressively from May to September 2020 as the B.1.177 variant became dominant. CONCLUSION: The risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection was considerable among close contacts of infected persons. The higher risk associated with household contacts, immigrants, older index cases, close contacts with lower income level and comorbidities should be considered to address preventive interventions.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Estudos de Coortes , Características da Família , Humanos , Fatores de Risco , SARS-CoV-2
16.
Euro Surveill ; 26(39)2021 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34596016

RESUMO

COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness by product (two doses Comirnaty, Spikevax or Vaxzevria and one of Janssen), against infection ranged from 50% (95% CI: 42 to 57) for Janssen to 86% (70 to 93) for Vaxzevria-Comirnaty combination; among ≥ 60 year-olds, from 17% (-26 to 45) for Janssen to 68% (48 to 80) for Spikevax; and against hospitalisation from 74% (43 to 88) for Janssen to > 90% for other products. Two doses of vaccine were highly effective against hospitalisation, but suboptimal for infection control.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Coinfecção , Vacinas , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2 , Espanha/epidemiologia
17.
BMC Infect Dis ; 21(Suppl 2): 898, 2021 Sep 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34517820

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is a crucial component in assessing and addressing the unmet needs of people, especially those with chronic illnesses such as HIV. The aim of the study was to examine and compare the health-related quality of life of people living with HIV in Romania and Spain, compared to the general populations of each country. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among adults (≥ 18 years) attending for HIV care in Romania and Spain from October 2019 to March 2020. The survey included two validated HRQoL instruments: a generic instrument, EQ-5D-5L, and an HIV-specific instrument, PozQoL, and questions on socio-demographics, HIV-related characteristics, physical and mental health conditions, and substance use. Multivariable linear regression was used to determine factors associated with HRQoL. RESULTS: 570 people living with HIV responded (170 in Romania and 400 in Spain). The median age was 31 (18-67) in Romania and 52 (19-83) in Spain. Anxiety/depression symptoms were frequently reported by people with HIV (Romania: 50% vs 30% in the Romanian population; Spain: 38% vs 15% in Spanish population). Spain reported higher mean EQ-5Dutility scores than Romania (0.88 and 0.85, respectively) but identical PozQoL scores (3.5, on a scale of 0-5). In both countries, health concerns were highlighted as a key issue for people with HIV. In multivariable analysis, two factors were consistently associated with worse HRQoL in people with HIV: bad or very bad self-rated health status and presence of a mental health condition. In Romania, being gay/bisexual and being disabled/unemployed were associated with worse HRQoL. Whereas in Spain, older age and financial insecurity were significant predictors. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicated a good HRQoL for people living with HIV in Romania and Spain; however, worse HRQoL profiles were characterized by health concerns, poor self-rated health status, and the presence of mental health conditions. This study highlights the importance of monitoring HRQoL in people living with HIV due to the chronic nature of the disease. In this highly-treatment experienced group, disparities were found, particularly highlighting mental health as an area which needs more attention to improve the well-being of people living with HIV.


Assuntos
Infecções por HIV , Qualidade de Vida , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos Transversais , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia , Humanos , Romênia/epidemiologia , Espanha/epidemiologia
18.
Euro Surveill ; 26(29)2021 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34296676

RESUMO

We measured COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness (VE) against symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection at primary care/outpatient level among adults ≥ 65 years old using a multicentre test-negative design in eight European countries. We included 592 SARS-CoV-2 cases and 4,372 test-negative controls in the main analysis. The VE was 62% (95% CI: 45-74) for one dose only and 89% (95% CI: 79-94) for complete vaccination. COVID-19 vaccines provide good protection against COVID-19 presentation at primary care/outpatient level, particularly among fully vaccinated individuals.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Adulto , Idoso , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , Atenção Primária à Saúde
19.
CMAJ ; 193(29): E1120-E1128, 2021 07 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34312165

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Although annual influenza vaccination is recommended for persons with asthma, its effectiveness in this patient population is not well described. We evaluated the effect of influenza vaccination in the current and previous seasons in preventing influenza among people with asthma. METHODS: Using population health data from the Navarre region of Spain for the 2015/16 to 2019/20 influenza seasons, we conducted a test-negative case-control study to assess the effect of influenza vaccination in the current and 5 previous seasons. From patients presenting to hospitals and primary health care centres with influenza-like illness who underwent testing for influenza, we estimated the effects of influenza vaccination among patients with asthma overall and between those presenting as inpatients or outpatients, as well as between patients with and without asthma. RESULTS: Of 1032 patients who had asthma and were tested, we confirmed that 421 had influenza and the remaining 611 were test-negative controls. We found that the average effect of influenza vaccination was 43% (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.57, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.40 to 0.80) for current-season vaccination regardless of previous doses, and 38% (adjusted OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.96) for vaccination in previous seasons only. Effects were similar for outpatients and inpatients. Among patients with asthma and confirmed influenza, current-season vaccination did not reduce the odds of hospital admission (adjusted OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.51 to 2.18). Influenza vaccination effects were similar for patients with and without asthma. INTERPRETATION: We estimated that, on average, current or previous influenza vaccination of people with asthma prevented almost half of influenza cases. These results support recommendations that people with asthma receive influenza vaccination.


Assuntos
Asma/tratamento farmacológico , Vacinas contra Influenza/farmacologia , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Asma/epidemiologia , Asma/prevenção & controle , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Vacinas contra Influenza/administração & dosagem , Influenza Humana/tratamento farmacológico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , Saúde da População/estatística & dados numéricos , Espanha/epidemiologia
20.
J Clin Med ; 10(12)2021 Jun 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34199198

RESUMO

We conducted a prospective population-based cohort study to assess risk factors for infection, hospitalization, and death from SARS-CoV-2. The study comprised the people covered by the Health Service of Navarre, Spain. Sociodemographic variables and chronic conditions were obtained from electronic healthcare databases. Confirmed infections, hospitalizations, and deaths from SARS-CoV-2 were obtained from the enhanced epidemiological surveillance during the second SARS-CoV-2 epidemic surge (July-December 2020), in which diagnostic tests were widely available. Among 643,757 people, 5497 confirmed infections, 323 hospitalizations, 38 intensive care unit admissions, and 72 deaths from SARS-CoV-2 per 100,000 inhabitants were observed. A higher incidence of confirmed infection was associated with people aged 15-29 years, nursing home residents, healthcare workers, people born in Latin America or Africa, as well as in those diagnosed with diabetes, cardiovascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), chronic kidney disease, dementia, severe obesity, hypertension and functional dependence. The risk of hospitalization in the population was associated with males, higher age, nursing home residents, Latin American or African origin, and those diagnosed with immunodeficiency, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, COPD, asthma, kidney disease, cerebrovascular disease, cirrhosis, dementia, severe obesity, hypertension and functional dependence. The risk of death was associated with males, higher age, nursing home residents, Latin American origin, low income level, immunodeficiency, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, COPD, kidney disease, dementia, and functional dependence. This study supports the prioritization of the older population, nursing home residents, and people with chronic conditions and functional dependence for SARS-CoV-2 prevention and vaccination, and highlights the need for additional preventive support for immigrants.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...